UGC NET PAPER 1 · UNIT 02 · MODULE 3: STEPS OF RESEARCH · TOPIC 3B

Review of Literature

Notes on review of literature for UGC NET Paper 1 Research Aptitude, in 5 short sub-topics. Each one gives the concept, the facts to memorise and the traps examiners set.

  • 5 sub-topics
  • 11 memory points
  • 5 exam-trap notes
  • 3 min read
  • Topic 10 of 29

What this topic covers

5 sub-topics, in the order to study them. Tap one to jump to it.

  1. 3B.1Purpose and Qualities of a Literature ReviewA literature review surveys and critically evaluates what is already known about the topic.
    • research gap
  2. 3B.2Primary and Secondary Sources of LiteraturePrimary literature reports original research or ideas for the first time: research articles, theses, conference papers, patents and technical reports.
    • Primary literature
    • Secondary literature
    • Tertiary sources
    • Grey literature
  3. 3B.3Search Strategies and Boolean OperatorsEffective searching starts with keywords and their synonyms.
    • AND
    • NOT
    • Truncation
    • Citation chaining
  4. 3B.4Repositories: Shodhganga and INFLIBNETShodhganga is the national repository of Indian electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs), maintained by the INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar, an inter-university centre of…
    • Shodhganga
    • Shodhgangotri
    • e-ShodhSindhu
    • Vidwan
  5. 3B.5Types of Reviews and Journal MetricsA narrative review summarises a field selectively.
    • narrative
    • systematic review
    • meta-analysis
    • scoping review
    • impact factor

Revision mode hides the Concept paragraphs and keeps the Memorise points, exam traps and tables. Use it from your second read onward.

3B.1Purpose and Qualities of a Literature Review#

Concept

A literature review surveys and critically evaluates what is already known about the topic. It helps the researcher avoid duplication, discover the research gap, sharpen the problem and hypotheses, build the theoretical framework, learn which methods and tools worked, and compare later findings with earlier ones. A good review is relevant, current, organised thematically or chronologically, critical rather than merely descriptive, and ends by showing what is missing. It begins early but continues throughout the study. A research gap is a question that earlier studies left unanswered or answered inadequately.

Memorise

  • Purposes: avoid duplication, find gap, refine problem, frame theory, choose methods.
  • Good review: critical synthesis, not a list of summaries.

Analyse / traps

Citing many studies is not a review; synthesis and critique are what count.

Back to topic map ↑

3B.2Primary and Secondary Sources of Literature#

Concept

Primary literature reports original research or ideas for the first time: research articles, theses, conference papers, patents and technical reports. Secondary literature interprets or summarises primary work: review articles, textbooks, encyclopaedias, handbooks and yearbooks. Tertiary sources help you find the others: indexes, abstracts, bibliographies, directories and databases. Grey literature includes reports, working papers and theses that are not commercially published.

Memorise

  • Primary: original research. Secondary: reviews, textbooks. Tertiary: indexes, bibliographies.
  • Grey literature: outside commercial publishing.

Analyse / traps

A review article is secondary even if it appears in a journal.

Back to topic map ↑

3B.3Search Strategies and Boolean Operators#

Concept

Effective searching starts with keywords and their synonyms. Boolean operators combine terms: AND narrows the search (both terms must appear), OR broadens it (either term, useful for synonyms), and NOT excludes a term. Truncation (for example educat*) finds word endings, wildcards replace single characters, and quotation marks search an exact phrase. Field searching, filters for date and type, and controlled vocabulary or thesaurus terms (such as MeSH in medicine) refine results. Citation chaining follows references backward and citations forward from a good paper.

Memorise

  • AND narrows; OR widens; NOT excludes.
  • Truncation (*) for word stems; quotes for exact phrases.
  • Snowballing = following references and citing papers.

Analyse / traps

If you want more results, use OR; if you want fewer and more precise results, use AND.

Back to topic map ↑

3B.4Repositories: Shodhganga and INFLIBNET#

Concept

Shodhganga is the national repository of Indian electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs), maintained by the INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar, an inter-university centre of the UGC. UGC regulations require universities to deposit the electronic copy of every approved doctoral thesis there. Shodhgangotri holds synopses of research topics from registered scholars. Other INFLIBNET services include e-ShodhSindhu, the consortium for electronic resources, and Vidwan, the database of experts. Searching Shodhganga shows what Indian doctoral work already exists on a topic.

Memorise

  • Shodhganga = theses; Shodhgangotri = synopses; INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar (UGC).
  • e-ShodhSindhu = e-resources consortium; Vidwan = experts database.

Analyse / traps

Shodhganga holds completed theses, whereas Shodhgangotri holds synopses of ongoing research.

Back to topic map ↑

3B.5Types of Reviews and Journal Metrics#

Concept

A narrative review summarises a field selectively. A systematic review follows an explicit protocol, searches comprehensively, applies stated inclusion criteria and appraises quality, often reported by PRISMA guidelines. A meta-analysis statistically pools effect sizes across studies. A scoping review maps the extent of literature. Journal quality is often judged by metrics. The impact factor (Clarivate’s Journal Citation Reports) is the number of citations in a year to items published in the previous two years divided by the number of citable items in those years. CiteScore (Scopus) uses a four-year window. The h-index (Hirsch, 2005) is the largest number h such that the author has h papers each cited at least h times; the i10-index counts papers with at least ten citations.

Memorise

  • Impact factor: two-year window, Clarivate. CiteScore: four-year window, Scopus.
  • h-index: Hirsch, 2005. Systematic review: protocol; meta-analysis: statistical pooling.

Analyse / traps

Impact factor measures a journal, h-index measures an author; mixing them is a typical trap.

Back to topic map ↑

Test yourself on Review of Literature

Practise with free MCQs and answer keys, then return here to fix what you got wrong.

↑ Module 3: Steps of Research · All 29 topics in Research Aptitude · Unit overview and sample MCQs

Last updated: . Notes are a revision aid; check official UGC sources for any rule or scheme that changes over time. Spotted a mistake? Write to netlawverse@gmail.com.