UGC NET LAW (058) · UNIT 07 · REVISION

Family Law Rapid-Recall Sheet

Each line is a typical direct-recall item. Use it in the last days of revision, after you have read the topics and the exam traps.

  • 86 high-yield facts
  • One page
  • Type to filter

High-yield facts

Rapid-recall facts
ItemKey fact
Collector of Madura v Moottoo Ramalinga (1868)Sources; Clear custom overrides written text
State of Bombay v Narasu Appa Mali (1952)Sources; Personal law is not ‘law in force’ for Article 13 (contested)
Vishwa Lochan Madan v Union of India (2014)Sources; Fatwas and Sharia courts have no legal force
Bhaurao Lokhande v State of Maharashtra (1965)Marriage; Solemnisation requires proper ceremonies
Dolly Rani v Manish Kumar Chanchal (2024)Marriage; Hindu marriage needs ceremonies; registration is evidence only
Seema v Ashwani Kumar (2006)Marriage; Compulsory registration of all marriages
Sarla Mudgal (1995) and Lily Thomas (2000)Marriage; Conversion to remarry is bigamy
Revanasiddappa v Mallikarjun (2023)Marriage; Children of void and voidable marriages share parents’ property
Lata Singh (2006); Shakti Vahini (2018); Shafin Jahan (2018)Marriage; Free choice of spouse is protected by Article 21
Supriyo v Union of India (2023)Marriage; No fundamental right to marry; SMA not read down
Shamim Ara v State of UP (2002)Muslim divorce; Talaq must be for cause, preceded by attempt at reconciliation and proved
Shayara Bano v Union of India (2017)Muslim divorce; Instant triple talaq void (3:2)
Zohara Khatoon v Mohd. Ibrahim (1981)Muslim divorce; Khula and the wife’s right to dissolution
N.G. Dastane v S. Dastane (1975)Divorce; Cruelty: balance of probabilities
Shobha Rani v Madhukar Reddi (1988)Divorce; Cruelty need not be intentional; dowry demand is cruelty
Samar Ghosh v Jaya Ghosh (2007)Divorce; Mental cruelty illustrations; irretrievable breakdown considerations
Bipinchandra v Prabhawati (1957)Divorce; Elements of desertion
Saroj Rani v Sudarshan Kumar (1984)Divorce; Section 9 valid; Sareetha overruled in effect
Sureshta Devi v Om Prakash (1991)Divorce; Consent in 13B must continue till decree
Amardeep Singh v Harveen Kaur (2017)Divorce; 6-month period under 13B(2) is directory
Shilpa Sailesh v Varun Sreenivasan (2023)Divorce; Article 142 divorce on irretrievable breakdown
Joseph Shine v Union of India (2018)Divorce; Adultery decriminalised; still a civil ground
D. Velusamy v D. Patchaiammal (2010)Live-in; Four conditions for ‘relationship in the nature of marriage’
Indra Sarma v V.K.V. Sarma (2013)Live-in; Guidelines; not every live-in is protected by DV Act
S. Khushboo v Kanniammal (2010)Live-in; Live-in not an offence
Y. Narasimha Rao v Y. Venkata Lakshmi (1991)Foreign decrees; Test for recognition of foreign matrimonial decrees
Satya v Teja Singh (1975)Foreign decrees; Fraud on jurisdiction invalidates foreign divorce
Bai Tahira (1979); Fuzlunbi (1980); Shah Bano (1985)Maintenance; Section 125 applies to Muslims; mahr is not a bar
Danial Latifi (2001)Maintenance; 1986 Act valid; fair provision covers future
Mohd. Abdul Samad (2024)Maintenance; Section 125 CrPC available to Muslim women in addition to 1986 and 2019 Acts
Rajnesh v Neha (2020)Maintenance; Affidavit of assets; interim maintenance from application
Satish Chander Ahuja v Sneha Ahuja (2020)Maintenance; ‘Shared household’ includes in-laws’ house where she lived
Abdul Kadir v Salima (1886)Dower and stridhan; Dower is not consideration, but respect to the wife
Maina Bibi (1924); Kapore Chand (1953)Dower and stridhan; Widow’s lien, no title
Tulasamma (1977)Dower and stridhan; Section 14(1) HSA enlarges limited estate in lieu of maintenance
Pratibha Rani v Suraj Kumar (1985)Dower and stridhan; Stridhan belongs solely to the wife
Shabnam Hashmi (2014)Adoption and guardianship; JJ Act adoption open to all irrespective of religion
Lakshmi Kant Pandey (1984)Adoption and guardianship; Inter-country adoption guidelines; child’s welfare
Gita Hariharan v RBI (1999)Adoption and guardianship; Mother can be natural guardian even in father’s lifetime (‘after’ = ‘in absence of’)
ABC v State (NCT of Delhi) (2015)Adoption and guardianship; Unwed mother as sole guardian
Imambandi v Mutsaddi (1918)Adoption and guardianship; Mother has custody but is not guardian of property (Muslim law)
Gurupad v Hirabai (1978)Succession; Notional partition
Prakash v Phulavati (2015); Danamma (2018); Vineeta Sharma (2020)Succession; Evolution of daughters’ coparcenary rights; Vineeta settles
Arunachala Gounder v Ponnusamy (2022)Succession; Daughter inherits father’s self-acquired property
John Vallamattom (2003)Succession; Section 118 ISA unconstitutional
Venkatachala Iyengar v Thimmajamma (1959)Will, gift, wakf; Proof of wills; suspicious circumstances
Mohammad Abdul Ghani v Fakhr Jahan (1922)Will, gift, wakf; Muslim gift needs no registration
Hafeeza Bibi v Shaikh Farid (2011)Will, gift, wakf; Oral Muslim gift valid with declaration, acceptance and delivery
In re: Waqf (Amendment) Act 2025 (15 September 2025)Will, gift, wakf; Interim order: key provisions stayed; whole Act not stayed
Shah Bano (1985); Sarla Mudgal (1995); John Vallamattom (2003)UCC; Urged enactment of UCC
HMA 19552 (application), 3 (definitions), 4 (overriding), 5 (conditions), 7 (ceremonies), 8 (registration), 9 (RCR), 10 (JS), 11 (void), 12 (voidable), 13, 13A, 13B, 14 (one-year bar), 15, 16 (legitimacy), 17 (bigamy), 19 (jurisdiction), 21B, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28
SMA 19544, 5, 7, 15, 21, 21A, 27, 28, 29
HSA 19562, 4, 6, 8–10, 14, 15–16, 25–29, 30
HAMA 19565–17 (adoption), 18 (wife), 19 (daughter-in-law), 20 (children and parents), 21–23
HMGA 19564, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13
GWA 18904(1), 7, 17, 19, 25, 29
DMMA 19392 (nine grounds), 4, 5
Muslim Women Acts1986 Act: 3, 4, 5; 2019 Act: 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
CrPC 125 → BNSS 144125 CrPC = 144 BNSS; 126–128 = 145–147
IPC → BNS494 → 82; 498A → 85 (cruelty defined in 86); 304B → 80; 406 → 316
Evidence Act → BSA112 → 116; 114 → 119; 113B → 118; 108 → 111
ISA 192533, 35 (Christians), 50–56 (Parsis), 57–58, 59, 61, 63, 65–66, 70, 118, 213, 218, 370
TPA 1882122–129 (gift)
Waqf Act 19953(r), 3(i), 36, 51, 83, 85; 2025 Amendment: 3C and the five-year rule
Foreign decreesCPC 13, 14, 44A
Marriage age under HMA and SMA21 (man), 18 (woman)
Desertion (HMA)2 years
No cohabitation after JS or RCR decree1 year
Presumption of death7 years
Divorce petition bar after marriage1 year
13B separation / second-motion window1 year / 6–18 months
Divorce Act 10A separation2 years
Interim maintenance Section 24decide within 60 days
Sapinda degrees5 (father’s line), 3 (mother’s line)
Void marriages clauses5(i), (iv), (v)
Natural guardian custody rulechild under 5 with mother
HMGA lease limit without permission5 years (and not beyond 1 year after majority)
Age gap in adoption21 years
Adoptee agebelow 15 unless custom
Muslim willone-third
Muslim hiba requirementdeclaration, acceptance, delivery
Daughters’ coparcenary9 September 2005; partition cut-off 20 December 2004
Class I heirs16
Triple talaq judgment22 August 2017; 2019 Act: Section 4: up to 3 years
DMMA grounds9 clauses (absent husband 4 years; non-maintenance 2 years; imprisonment 7 years; marital obligation 3 years; insanity 2 years)
Waqf non-Muslim members in interim orderCentral Council 4; State Boards 3

Where each fact is explained

Open the topic for the concept behind any line you cannot recall.

← Chapter overviewPractise MCQs →

Last updated: .