1.1Concept: growth, development and sustainability#
In brief
Economic growth means a rise in output or income, usually measured by GDP, while development is a wider idea that includes health, education, equity, freedom and the quality…
Economic growth means a rise in output or income, usually measured by GDP, while development is a wider idea that includes health, education, equity, freedom and the quality of the environment. The central question of this topic is whether a society can keep improving human well-being without destroying the natural base that supports it. For a long time the answer was assumed to be yes, because resources looked unlimited. The Club of Rome report Limits to Growth (1972) challenged that belief by arguing that exponential growth on a finite planet must eventually overshoot, and the same year the Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment put environment on the international agenda for the first time and led to the creation of UNEP.
The idea of sustainable development was given its classic definition in Our Common Future (1987), the report of the World Commission on Environment and Development chaired by Gro Harlem Brundtland. It defines sustainable development as development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Two ideas sit inside this definition: the concept of needs, especially the essential needs of the world's poor, and the idea of limitations imposed by technology and social organization on the environment's ability to meet present and future needs. Sustainability is therefore built on intergenerational equity (fairness between generations) and intragenerational equity (fairness within the present generation, between rich and poor and between countries).
Sustainable development is usually shown as three interlinked pillars: economic, social and environmental. The business version of this is John Elkington's triple bottom line (people, planet, profit). Economists separate weak sustainability, which assumes that man-made capital can substitute for natural capital as long as total capital does not fall, from strong sustainability, which holds that some natural capital (such as the ozone layer, climate stability or biodiversity) is critical and cannot be replaced by machines or money. The Environmental Kuznets Curve proposes that pollution first rises and then falls as income grows, giving an inverted U; critics note that it holds for some local pollutants such as sulphur dioxide but not for carbon dioxide or biodiversity loss. The ecological footprint (Wackernagel and Rees) measures the biologically productive area needed to support a population's consumption and absorb its waste, and planetary boundaries (Johan Rockstrom and colleagues) define safe operating limits for Earth-system processes such as climate change, biosphere integrity and nitrogen cycles. Doughnut Economics (Kate Raworth) places a social foundation below and an ecological ceiling above, with the safe and just space for humanity between them. Bhutan's Gross National Happiness is an example of a development philosophy that does not rely on GDP alone, and the Human Development Index (Mahbub ul Haq, 1990, published by UNDP) combines health, education and standard of living.