11.1Case to principle (the match-the-following core)#
In brief
Case Principle Topic Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor (1925) "They also serve who only stand and wait"; s.34 / s.3(5) Common intention Mahbub Shah v. King Emperor (1945)…
| Case | Principle | Topic |
|---|---|---|
| Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor (1925) | "They also serve who only stand and wait"; s.34 / s.3(5) | Common intention |
| Mahbub Shah v. King Emperor (1945) | Common intention vs similar intention | Common intention |
| Pandurang v. State of Hyderabad (1955) | Common intention can form on the spot | Common intention |
| Masalti v. State of U.P. (1965) | Liability of members of an unlawful assembly (s.149 / s.190) | Common object |
| State of Maharashtra v. M.H. George (1965) | Strict liability (FERA) | Mens rea |
| Nathulal v. State of M.P. (1966) | Mens rea in regulatory statute | Mens rea |
| Standard Chartered Bank v. Directorate of Enforcement (2005) | Company can be prosecuted; fine where imprisonment mandatory | Corporate liability |
| Kehar Singh v. State (1988) | Proof of conspiracy by circumstantial evidence | Conspiracy |
| State v. Nalini (1999) | Continuing conspiracy; chain and wheel | Conspiracy |
| Topan Das v. State of Bombay (1955) | One person cannot conspire alone | Conspiracy |
| Abhayanand Mishra v. State of Bihar (1961) | Attempt begins where preparation ends | Attempt |
| Malkiat Singh v. State of Punjab (1970) | Mere preparation, not attempt | Attempt |
| Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996) | No right to die under Art. 21; abetment of suicide punishable | Abetment |
| Chirangi v. State of M.P. (1952) | Mistake of fact | General exceptions |
| State of Orissa v. Ram Bahadur Thapa (1960) | Mistake of law is no defence | General exceptions |
| Dahyabhai Thakker v. State of Gujarat (1964) | Legal insanity; burden on accused | Insanity |
| Hari Singh Gond v. State of M.P. (2008) | Legal vs medical insanity | Insanity |
| Basdev v. State of PEPSU (1956) | Intoxication and intention | Intoxication |
| Darshan Singh v. State of Punjab (2010) | Principles of private defence | Private defence |
| Jai Dev v. State of Punjab (1963) | No private defence where time to seek help | Private defence |
| K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra (1962) | Grave and sudden provocation; cooling time; end of jury trials | Murder |
| Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab (1958) | Four-step test for "thirdly" in murder | Murder |
| Reg v. Govinda (1876) | Culpable homicide vs murder | Homicide |
| Mithu v. State of Punjab (1983) | Mandatory death penalty invalid | Punishment |
| Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980) | Rarest of rare | Death penalty |
| Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab (1983) | Five categories for rarest of rare | Death penalty |
| Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab (2005) | Gross negligence for doctors | Negligence |
| Kans Raj v. State of Punjab (2000) | "Soon before death" in dowry death | Dowry death |
| S. Varadarajan v. State of Madras (1965) | "Taking" vs voluntarily accompanying (kidnapping) | Kidnapping |
| Pyare Lal Bhargava v. State of Rajasthan (1963) | Temporary removal can be theft | Theft |
| R.S. Nayak v. A.R. Antulay (1986) | Extortion needs delivery by inducement | Extortion |
| Velji Raghavji Patel v. State of Maharashtra (1965) | Partner and CBT | CBT |
| Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar (2000) | Breach of contract vs cheating | Cheating |
| Tukaram v. State of Maharashtra (1979) | Mathura rape case; led to 1983 amendment | Rape |
| Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) | Guidelines on sexual harassment at workplace | Women |
| Independent Thought v. Union of India (2017) | Marital rape exception read down for wives under 18 | Women |
| Pramod Suryabhan Pawar v. State of Maharashtra (2019) | False promise of marriage and consent | Rape |
| Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018) | Adultery struck down | Marriage |
| Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) | No automatic arrest in s.498A | Cruelty |
| Just Rights for Children Alliance v. S. Harish (2024) | Storing child pornography is an offence; use CSEAM | POCSO |
| Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar (1962) | Sedition upheld with incitement-to-violence test | State offences |
| S.G. Vombatkere v. Union of India (2022) | Sedition law kept in abeyance | State offences |
| Tofan Singh v. State of T.N. (2020) | NCB officers are police officers; s.67 statements inadmissible | NDPS |
| Noor Aga v. State of Punjab (2008) | NDPS presumptions valid | NDPS |
| Umashankar v. State of Chhattisgarh (2001) | Possession of counterfeit notes needs knowledge | Counterfeiting |
| Ramji Lal Modi v. State of U.P. (1957) | s.295A valid | Religion |
| Bilal Ahmed Kaloo v. State of A.P. (1997) | s.153A needs two groups | Public tranquillity |
| Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) | s.144 orders and internet shutdowns must be proportionate | Public order |
| Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa (1993) | Public-law compensation for custodial death | Victim compensation |