0.1What the examiner tests#
In brief
What the examiner actually tests in Unit V.
- Case-to-principle matching
- Match the following
- Statutory facts
What the examiner actually tests in Unit V. Based on the pattern of recent papers (this is an inference from past papers, not an official weightage), questions fall into five families:
-
Case-to-principle matching: Donoghue v Stevenson, Rylands v Fletcher, Wagon Mound, Kasturi Lal, Rudul Sah, M.C. Mehta.
-
Statement-based (I/II/III correct?) and Assertion–Reason: very common in torts defences, remoteness, and State liability.
-
Match the following: case ↔ principle, maxim ↔ meaning, section ↔ subject.
-
Statutory facts: Consumer Protection Act (CPA) 2019 pecuniary limits, appeal periods, CCPA powers; Motor Vehicles Act (MVA) no-fault amounts and Claims Tribunal provisions; Competition Act sections 3, 4, 5, 6 and the 2023 Amendment.
-
Chronology and "which is NOT" questions: e.g., which case rejected the directness test, which is not an element of negligence.