Copyright protects expression, not ideas, procedures, methods of operation or mathematical concepts (idea–expression dichotomy: R.G. Anand v. Delux Films, 1978; the test of substantial similarity is how the ordinary observer/lay viewer sees the two works). Section 13 lists the classes of work in which copyright subsists:
-
Original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works
-
Cinematograph films
-
Sound recordings
Key definitions (Section 2):
-
Literary work (2(o)) includes computer programmes, tables and compilations including computer databases.
-
Dramatic work (2(h)) includes recitation, choreographic work or entertainment in dumb show, scenic arrangement (the acting form); it does not include a cinematograph film.
-
Musical work (2(p)): music and any graphical notation; it does not include words or action intended to be sung, spoken or performed with the music (lyrics are a separate literary work).
-
Artistic work (2(c)): painting, sculpture, drawing (including diagram, map, chart or plan), engraving, photograph, work of architecture, and any other work of artistic craftsmanship; the artistic quality of the work is irrelevant for paintings/sculptures/drawings/engravings/photographs.
-
Cinematograph film (2(f)): any work of visual recording on any medium, including a sound recording accompanying it, and any work produced by video or any similar process.
-
Sound recording (2(xx)): recording of sounds from which sounds can be produced, regardless of the medium.
-
Author (2(d)): literary/dramatic – the author; musical – the composer; artistic – the artist; photograph – the photographer; cinematograph film and sound recording – the producer; computer-generated work – the person who causes the work to be created.
-
Communication to the public (2(ff)): making a work available to the public by any means of display or diffusion, other than by issuing copies.
Originality. India moved from the English "sweat of the brow" standard (University of London Press v. University Tutorial Press, 1916) to the "modicum of creativity" standard in Eastern Book Company v. D.B. Modak (2008, SC): copy-edited judgments and headnotes of law reports qualify only if the editorial inputs show a minimum degree of creativity and skill, not mere labour. The US analogue is Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone (1991). Photographs, translations, compilations and adaptations are protected as derivative works if original.
No copyright in: ideas, titles and slogans (generally, as insufficient), news facts, works of the Government that are statutory (but Government works carry copyright under Section 17(d)), and works not original. A "work" must also be fixed or expressed; copyright does not subsist in unpublished works of foreign authors unless the author is a qualified person (Section 13(2)–(3); International Copyright Order).